When a wokester grooms a youngster...

Tweek, Craig, & even the Daughters-Moses in the Strange Gardens of "Yowee"

wokester Groovy Grooming lesson 101… AFFIRM the imaginary rainbow

SO…. I preface this piece sayin’ I could give 2 hoots wuther sum’buddy is gay or not BUT when my kids are the “Bingo!”cuz someone’s playin’ THEM fer “score points,” then I DO call foul! An’ so it wuz that my girls got “played.”

I recently learned that back in ’21 my older daughter, an “Aspie,” age 18 at the time an' arguably a "youngster" (aspies bein' more immature than yer typical teens), wuz repeatedly INTRODUCED to friends of her "SITTER"✳ as bein' GAY, much to her GEN-u-ine chagrin (and oddly, in spite’ve her bein’ “troubled” by this treatment, she never mentioned it ta me 'til NOW, 3 years later). 

Said wokester-"sitter"-the-expert — I’ll call her “Avery” cuz she likes labels!—more ‘n once "TOLD" MY DAUGHTER SHE "definitely" WAS GAY✳✳ an' just wasn't CONNECTING WITH HER "OBVIOUS" GAYNESS (even tho' my daughter stated she didn't feel "gay" at all!). 
More on the "obvious" part in a sec. 

Said "SITTER" ALSO repeatedly told her IT WAS OK to BE GAY !!!—like a crazy affirmation MANTRA (man-trance?!) an' that it wuz OK TO COME "OUT" an' BE HER TRUE AUTHENTIC SELF. (This angle, of course, completely ignored that my girl didn’t need ta come outta anythin’ and was ALREADY her gol’danged true “authentic” self…)

OK to “COME OUT?”
as in yoooohoooo COME OUT COME OUT WHEREVER YOU ARE?!

(Kansas wuz not the name of my daughter's star tho'…) ANYWHOO…

When daughter an' sitter were out an' about (out not 🌈”out”🌈 ), my daughter wuz directed to "identify with" GAY ART when it appeared in gallery or museum works, an' wuz shown GAY LIT'RATURE in bookstores an' encouraged ta purchase it with her own spendin' money VS said "sitter" lettin' my kiddo peruse 'er buy stuff in which she actually was interested! (which wuzn't gay stuff, I'm promsin' ya)   

MIND Y'ALL I KNEW NUTTIN' OF THIS AT TIME 'er I'D'A FLAPPED MY JAW LOUDLY 'BOUT THIS "GROOMIN'!" — if I’d ONLY known!

The punchline to all this?—this SITTER herself WUZ NOT GAY.

NOT A BIT! Not a mite! Hadda boyfriend even!…but THIS, you'll see, is a THING. 

THE ADJACENT STATUS THING...
See, MOST folks when they talk about groomin’ they specify that the younger / more vulnerable “groom-ee” is likely bein’ groomed b/c the groomer wants ta git inta their pants / panties / adult diapers?! AND THEREFORE assume that all groomin’ is “sexually motivated.”  

What NOBUDDY is talkin’ bout is groomin’ kids/vulnerable indy-viduals for STATUS — the "adjacent" kinda status.  

YES, it's hangin' on to others that are members (however unwittin' they may be) of the most-valorized, prioritized, lionized “EYE-DENT-TAH-TEE” GROUPS an' MOLDIN' these others members (be they unawares or savvy…) to even HIGHER STATUS (state-ass!) SO THEIR finely-HONED HIGHER FOOTIN’ then rubs off on the HANGER-ON…THIS is a thing. 

rubbin’ elbows “gaily gaily” is velly “unsportsmanlike”

So this "thing," you'll see in a seccy, wuz sumthin’ even SOUTH PARK wuz onto!

It's a wannabe-thing.  It's a POSEUR thing.  AND…it's a messed up thing too!

NOW back in the days where heads sat on necks (not under keesters!) it used ta be that NOBUDDY wanted ta BE (let alone be WITH) the nerd, the gay outlier, 'er GODFERBID the "Special Needs" kid.  I’m all fer acceptin’ the square peg by the by, BUT puttin’ them at the TOP an’ idolizin’ the “geeks & freaks”? Gorsh, wha’happened?

In the 1988 a’moosin’-moosical of John Waters' "Hairspray," SPECIAL ED is the most cringe-worthy, embarrassin' disgrace EVER — it's a runnin' joke in the film!  If I may speak “truth to power” folks—AUTISM is NOT a “superpower” at all (super ‘effin’ power my foot!). It’s not remotely sumthin’ to “aspire to”—it’s sumthin’ to REVERSE (yup, I said it—the unwoke truth). For many with it (not ta mention their exhausted parents), it’s absolute hell in a handbasket, so why (oh why) is it the cherry on top of the woke pyramid? But ‘tis.

Today in topsy-turvy woke-land the GREATER the DISABILITY the higher rank in IDENTARIAN NOBILITY!  Extra pernts fer bi-pocks, trannies, fatties, uglies, an' individuals with (I kid'ja not) DRAG SYNDROME!

Drag + Downs Syndrom = DRAG SYNDROME (it’s real, drop yer jaws now!)

So in the realm of bassackwards, where up iz DOWNS (an’ DOWNS is up!)—it’s a note of “de-stink-shun” bein’ ‘close to disability, rubbin’ elbows with an’ “AUTHENTIC AUTISTIC” like my “bona fide” Aspie girl — but moreso if ya kin make ‘em gay (or do drag or even romanticize the cultivatin’ of yer “girl stache”✳✳✳)!

✳✳✳I don’t give a hoot ‘bout natch’ral lady body hairs but it’s kinda screwy, if ya ask me, ta market & PROMOTE it

As I said this valorization of the upside-down is a “messed up thing” an’ speakin' of MESSES—an' what I "guess" wuz thought ta be my child's so-called "OBVIOUS" GAYNESS  per the clueless sitter, wuz THIS:

The irony is that once upon a time it wuz “a GAY crime!” ta be SO blatantly UNfashionable! What I’m pointin’ out is that such hygiene ‘n groomin’ challenges ain’t gay signalin’ OR signs of gender confusion; they just’a’bout SCREAM autism!

Anywayz, this whole cringy discovery of what my daughter experienced with her “sitter” coincided (hey it’s synchronicity!) with a strange TREND I discovered by sheer accident called YAOI (pronounced YOWEE!)

YoweeKazowie, SOUTHPARK GITS IT RIGHT
(a rilly great episode…)

So by total chance I wartched THIS here episode below with my girls (we toon-fans ain't all 'bout Shakespeare 'n Kafka!), an' INSTANTLY it ALL started ta make sense—the nearly-systematized underlyin' SOCIAL AGENDA & "reward" for this kinda behavior… (click below ta wartch it, it’s about 20-ish minutes!)

TWEEK X CRAIG EPISODE 1906 (they periodically offer it online fer free viewin’!)

YOWEE! (Yaoi!) KAZOWIE! indeedy

So, in the above South Park episode, Tweek & Craig, two regular non-gay elementary skool boys in 4^th grade that are best buds become the homoerotic FANtasy object (couple)-du-jour of a bunch'a girls that love this type of homoerotic anime / manga style comic called YAOI. (“yowee”)

UNTIL seein' that episode on South Park tho, I had NO IDEAR this "YOWEE!" trend even existed—for REAL!  It's a fan-girl thing.  It’s straight gals havin’ boy-boy (or worse, man-boy!) luv "FAN-tasies" ILLUSTRATED. (Oy! or ya-oy! ta be exact)

WHO KNEW THIS TREND even EXISTED?

It's been around since the 1960s but seems ta be amped up more today given the current "gay agenda" AND also the CULTy--vated 21^st C taste fer all things MANGA.

The boys go from bein' Tweek and Craig to BEING TOLD they are NOW the item: TWEEK X CRAIG… like they'ze not only an "item" (meanin' a couple) but an ITEM literally (a commodity / an OBJECT!) X means they are romantically “connected.”

note that Tweek is tied up like a “present”—bound kinda bondage-like, immobilized (powerless) an’ sissfied, with the bow on his head—so we git submission an’ feminization and it’s all graphic GROOMIN’ in cartoon candy-colors!

So when I saw that episode of South Park, a lightbulb went off an’ I UNDERSTOOD whut went down with BOTH my gals (yup, ta a lesser degree with my younger one too! read on…) in this otherwise BIZARRE groomin' practice of PUSHIN' OTHERS to TAKE ON A PERSONA YOU YERSELF DON'T HAVE but WANT THEM TO HAVE SO YOU CAN BE ASSOCIATED WITH 'EM and therefore “ALLIED” with the ENVIED IDENTITY.  

OR, similarly, this same line’ve thinkin’ applies if “YOU” have chosen ta wrap yerself up in some newfangled woke/gay/trans/transgressive “adopted” IDENTITY an’ yer aim is then in “MAKING-over” another person (ideally somebuddy ya think is a pushover or naive or less confident or more vulnerable, etc.) IN YOUR IMAGE— i.e. “just like you”— by gettin’ them to also embrace the same "newfangled" identity you’ve chosen. Doing so VALIDATES YOU as well as THE folks who have TAKEN ON this arguably (faux-)identity. 

THIS IS A COSPLAY THEATER GAME for WOKESTERS livin’ this in REAL TIME.
Lordy this is messed up, no? (am I makin’ sense here?)

INTERSECTIONALITY Ain't 12^th & VINE…

which way ta the eeeee-gress?! git me outta here!

Making OTHERS an "elevated" or so-called intersectional VICTIM-minority (take yer pick which one, there are SOoooo many) is quite the THING today.  

This means our "sitter" follered an example already set in her own social circle. She likely saw others in her peer group similarly groom friends an' acquaintances—so likely she figgered it wuz okay. Some apprenticeship?! An' this turrible trend thus spread like fluffernutter (emphasis on the nutter) on Wonder Bread (no vunder?!). Seems the wokesters are eatin’ it up tho’

And… if you're not THAT THING yourself (i.e. that uplifted, intersectional identity), then  "SUPPORTIN' " the VICTIMIZED indy-vidge-you-all in a very VIRTUOUS an' OVERT WAY—iz the NEXT BEST THING to “being” that thing!  Doin’ so allows them their elevated MINORITY STATUS an' YOU the cool "CACHET" of bein' ASS-O-CIA-tid with that “valorized” label – getting' it to RUB OFF ON YOO-TOO!  THAT is it! 

Yuckeroonie!

Thus YOU TOO become one of the DIVINELY DISABLED, one’a them: GORGEOUS GAYS, PERFECT PANSEXUALS, TRANSFORMATIONAL TRANNIES, FETCHIN' FATTIES or FINE-FEATHERED FURRIES  or  NOTABLE NULLOS an' so on…AD-NAUSEUM! ‑ one of the “SPECIAL” people BY ASS-O-CIA-SHUN! YOU git ELEVATED yerself by linkin' up with the VICTIMIZED OH SO VENERATED ONES! 

STATUS (state-us) by ASS-o-CIA-shun!

An' if these selected pals are not conveniently willin’ to be whatever ya want them ta be—i.e. if they ain't quite "there" (if they ain’t gay, trans, etc), you can still find a way to MANUFACTURE their STORY—MAKE THEM BE WHAT YOU WANT so you can bask in their "arty-fish-ally" engineered LIGHT (“fishy” as that sounds—it makes “you” a virtuous ALLY!—no small thing in a world that vigorously applauds “allies”).

How ta “Win (Woke) Friends & Influence (Dupe-able) People” —in 4 easy steps! :

1. Tell yer pals yer “friend” is gay! (even if they ain’t)

2. Use gay pronouns to address them even if they ain’t a “them” or a “zir.”

3. Share “gay comics” that show ‘em dancin’ “cheek to cheek” (not like Fred & Ginger neither!)

4. In other words, SPEAK YOUR FAKE TRUTH to “MAKE” the NARRATIVE you want.

Talk about bein’ MANIPULATIVE! (Of course they / zey won’t see it thatta way…)

If I could put words (nay, lyrics) inta the mouths of Tweek, Craig, an’ my dear daughters ‘bout the friendly “allies” that seem ta benefit greatly from proximity, THIS would be what I’d say:

Don't tell me what to do…don't tell me what to say…
please when I got out with you, don't put me on display…

Brief Aside On: PROJECTING IDENTITY in LITERATURE i.e. “wishful thinkin’”

In a strange and poignant way, this kind of wish-full “projection” reminds me a bit of Carson McCullers’ THE HEART IS A LONELY HUNTER.  The book highlights the human desire to mold/sculpt others’ identities to suit our own needs, albeit in a less “weaponized” manner than we see today. In the novel, our deaf, sensitive, co-protagonist, Singer "projects" imagined (wished-for) intelligence and true friendship onto his pal Antonapoulos, who simply is too low functionin' ta reciprocate genuinely. Nearly EVERYBODY else (Mick, Jake, Biff, etc) imagines Singer to be the only one that understands them when—although Singer reads lips well—he actually finds it difficult ta figure out their motives and what’s on their minds—though lord knows he tries. 

The story—'bout projectin' hopes 'n dreams and perceptions of "understandin'" onto others—ends very sadly—as duz the South Park Episode, a far less upbeat ending than is usual for that oft-fun show.

THANKFULLY my daughter, havin’ shared with me her own weirdo saga, is fine—miffed a mite but not much the worse for havin’ been “USED” as a pawn in a gay identity agenda, even though I’ll own the “perpetrator” / aka Avery, likely did this unawares herself — i.e. with purpose to only “support” but via methods that, however unwittin’, were selfish and manipulative. So yup, I’m glad my daughter is “over it” BUT STILL, I DON’T LIKE IT (an’ neither did she).

KNOCKIN' IT OUTTA DA (SOUTH) PARK…
“how” they got it right!

they even nailed the parents gettin’ in on the groomin’ — offerin’ money AND “love affirmations” (the parents are SO open-minded an’ cool with their gay sons)

So, as I wrote, in the South Park episode the community pressure is “on” to make the boyz gay.  The adults are all woefully complicit too—not a single parent or town grown-up tries to stop the nonsense. In our real-life "sitter" episodes, the social pressure, similarly, was to make my daughter gay (again, she's even better-than-gay havin' a disability too—whoo hoo!)…. An' then wuther yer in South Park or NYShitty, the ultimate prize for all those in proximity to the “gay ones” is to CLAIM yer OWN status as a TRUE supporter!  

This status garners the “in” group’s tribal APPROVAL.  All this happens even if the original OBJECT of your attentions… OBJECTS! vociferously!

THE ART of “Miss Representation” an’ its FANBASE

It is an ART—doin' this just-so.  I believe that society has groomed at least TWO generations in this ART: Aesthetically and Conceptually. “Fans” have come-of-age normalizin’ it.

With Tweak X Craig, the skool teachers and admins. an' all the parents PUSH the CELEBRATION OF THE GAY COUPLE, Tweek & Craig (now Tweek X Craig), via speeches, announcements, public “shares” and social media (phones, etc).

The community, in the show, absolutely won't / absolutely don't HEAR the children’s own vocal denials. (Similarly our sitter wouldn't hear my daughter's objections—voiced only in private but…lemme say, stated but less-than-forcefully.)

WHEN FANART IMITATES LIFE!

So you’ll be shocked a mite when ya hear this…

Though the SHOW itself comes out clearly against the MIS-represenation of the boys as bein’ gay an’ anguishes thru the upsetting pressures they unfairly experience—this kind of animated social experiment in itself that is NOT at all unlike “real life” situations where young’uns ARE bein’ pressured into gayness or trans-ness or gender-whuteverness (and inta enterin’ the world of s.e.x. waaay too early!) SO…. the team behind the show wanted ta test out nearly the same SOCIAL EXPERIMENT on THE SHOW’S FANS.

An’ invitation wuz made for “fans” to contribute “fanart” in honor of the manga-style of the show. Anything would’ve been OK—such as showin’ the boys bein’ forced into a false coupleship by the female illlustrators or pressures from the other kids, etc. BUT NOTHING OF THE KIND HAPPENED!

Fans bizarrely ”READ” THE SHOW AS THEY WISHED and STARTED MAKING GAY FAN ART—GAY YAOI FAN ART—CELEBRATING TWEEK & CRAIG’S GAY ROMANCE! (Some fans even started speculatin’ all over the internet that South Park creators Parker and Stone were a gay couple too!—Nope, they “ain’t”—both are married to biological women with non-cartoon children, tho’ that didn’t stop fans from thinkin’ they are some kinda closeted couple…oy.)

“SHIPPING!” who’d’a thunk?! (nope, it ain’t “The Postal Store”)

So, there’s this phenomenon called “shipping” and it’s kinda the American version of YAOI but instead of professional MANGA publications in a very specific style, it’s more loosely contrived fan-art, similarly based on existing “characters” however. THUS, South Park Creators Parker & Stone literally turned TWEEK X CRAIG into a “SHIPPING CONTAINER!” They begat a “shipping” trend “contained” in their episode.

HA, I thought “shipping” was for packages!

BUT IT GETS EVEN STRANGER!

From all I gathered, fans insisted that the romance ‘tween the boys wuz REAL (?!) —no matter they are NINE ‘EFFIN’ YEARS OLD !!!! — AND… tho’ I’ve shared less “graphic” examples here, below, lemme tell y’all, FANS WENT HOGWILD with their pen an’ ink an’ some of the Tweek X Craig FANART images are purdy RAUNCHY!
(That’d be the kinda shipment “wrapped up in plain brown paper!”)

Lordy, this is SOoooo cwazy— Hard ta believe it BUT these wokester-fansters were SO happy ‘bout two 4th graders being depicted as GAY that they missed the message of the entire episode — about the RAM-a-fuk-cations of mis-ascribin’ ideologies onta real folks—how it messes ‘em up, hurts, harms.
It’s a frickin’ CARTOON an’ they didn’t understand it?!

noooooo! how can it be?!!!!!

LIFE immitates ART imitates LIFE, that’s fer sure!

The social pressures depicted in the show were a greater IMITATION OF LIFE in the 21st Century than I’ll bet even the makers bargained for!

SOCIAL PRESSURES!—it starts in the skools, it’s MIS-EDUCATION!

In the cartoon, all the boys' skool FRIENDS ('cept Cartman who thinks it's kinda gross this gay-boy thing, tho’ he eventually an’ also “succumbs” to his gay-cherb alter ego)—all these “FRIENDS” IMMEDIATELY accept Tweek X Craig's gay identities, COMPLETELY fergettin' that they've ALWAYS known these boys ta be JUST pals. Normal kids that are buddies.

This phenomenon is not unlike young'uns today fergettin' the “realities” of gender—ONCE UPON A TIME not that long ago they knew which kids were boys, which ones girls, and what used to pass for normalcy! NOW… it seems they’ve forgotten.

And… I think the BIGGEST change came in 2020… at that point it started that EVERYONE forgot WHO they WERE!

bullshart!

FITTIN' IN!, a pop-u-larity contest…

NONE OF THE KIDS or teachers wanted to be deemed "homophobic" so they TOO egged on the boys to "express their romance" an' they all tell Tweek & Craig ever so THOUGHTFULLY they are all OK with their lifestyle choice.  (i.e. that “It's OK to be GAY!”) AND… they even created a YAOI Tweek X Craig gay art show-in-the-show just to show their support. (Talk about bein’ META! ‘specially given the added “real life” fan-art effort that also surrounded the episode, wow -)

Tweek + Craig’s romance wuz depicted in the YAOI art show dedicated to the “young couple”—and of course all kids were invited to see it too… Gay Art Groomin’! (NOT unlike what happened ta my older girl!)

So… holy heck, this is exactly whut our woke-sitter Avery encouraged with my daughter—even down to lookin’ at “GAY ART” an’ then tellin’ her "IT'S OK to be gay" which wuz like a MANTRA repeated endlessly. SAME AS IN THE SHOW.

What wuz POIGNANT an’ sad, too, about the South Park episode IMO is that NOBODY HEARD THE BOYS. Nobody listened to their anguish, their embarrassment, their objections.  A few of the kids knew about the YAOI trend—but then they seemed to forget about it completely. Logic went down the terlet, seriously.

Ketchin’ the wave…

It wuz like a WAVE of purportedly EVER-SO-KIND an’ gentle WOKENESS swept over the town an’ was projected onto these little boys like some ghostly misty SHROUD—while their very real "just kids" selves were BURIED beneath that over-layin’ artificial scrim of gayness. Nobuddy NOTICED how they felt, there was NO EMPATHY, it was all PROJECTION!   Just like “sitter” Avery PROJECTING a "persona" on my DAUGHTER an’ not NOTICING the reaction, not showin’ any understanding for the young person onto whom she wuz “dumpin’” her gay agenda.  DAMN!

PURE PROJECTION !

…and all the while TAKIN’ ADVANTAGE of the situation by baskin’ in the co-opted limelight of others…

In retrospect, while writin’ this, I found sumthin’ else velly interestin’ bout this particular “sitter” who took advantage of my daughter to “up” her own status on the woke food chain (that’d be state-ass!). NEVER occurred ta me before but… at her college, Avery had WON an AWARD for her final stoo-dent project depictin’—sexy beautiful GAY MALES in “cheesecakey-pin-up girl” poses.

Now mind ya, I’m sayin’ it again, she’s a straight gal. I soitenly won’t “out” her or her so-called original (?) art work but — capable tho’ it wuz (it was), it looked kinda like THIS below—the style of the bigger illustration, the kitschy content of the smaller inset:

Avery’s “project” wuz CLEARLY & HEAVILY influenced by “Tom of Finland” (the two heads above are his). Jean jackets an’ maids uniforms were “switched up” from “hardcore” leather but the whole “pernt” is bein’ derivative of gay an’ campy aesthetics. So what strikes me here—is that a straight this gal “glommed on” ta male-gay-erotic “ahrt” ta win her “prize.”

Would she have won the award if she’d depicted straight couples or a less “trendy” subject? My guess? Heck no.

note: I could give 2 hoots ‘bout straight artists depictin’ gay subjects an’ vice-versa

BE U YOUNG or AUTISTIC—you CANNOT WIN at this MANIPULATION GAME

At the time this “gay push/putsch!” happened a few years back, my daughter sucked it up. When she told me, I asked her, "didn't ya say something when she introduced you to her friends as being gay?" And my daughter said, “NO because THAT would've been SO embarrassing, to correct your caregiver, to make her sound like a fool in front of her friends.“

I then clarified, "So you basically clammed up?"  My daughter owned that indeed was the case when she was introduced to others thattaway — yup, she wuz silent.

That said, she let me know that more 'n once she did politely tell Avery she "didn't think she wuz gay at all." But she never pushed back much. Problem is, today NO doesn’t mean “NO” it means…I guess, “MAYBE?” Do young people no longer know how to listen and honor a genuine request?

As I wrote above, my girl did her best to reject her sitter’s campaign to have her lookin' at gay-themed art, gay comics an' books (I hear one tome bein’ pushed wuz “lesbian love poems”), and so forth… but in bein’ “polite” she never FIRMLY ordered anything close to a full “STOP IT.” So the efforts continued unabated…

In retrospect, I DO think we gotta give our young’uns (all ages) the WORDS to fight back—FIRMLY. Cuz clearly a polite “no thanks” doesn’t seem to cut it. Not any more.

Ms Stanwyck could’a showed’em how!

It makes me a bit sore ‘n ornery thinkin' this wuz foisted on my girl who wuz even more vulnerable than most young people… but I think what happened here is indicative of a greater effort to exert heavy PRESSURE on all young minds… all amped up durin’ the plandemonium with wokesters bein’ the “cool” foot-soldiers of this harmful agenda.

A SMALL DIE-GRESSION - intersectionality WITH THE COVID CON!

IRONY is that my girl only had this new "sitter" due ta the plandemic which sent her old 'n reliable former comm hab "sitter" skedaddlin' outta New Yawk an' back home ta "safety" with her parents.'T'ain't easy ta find capable, reliable special needs caregiver sub-stee-toots in the middle of a covid-con!

THEN, apart from all this OK TO BE GAY malarkey, Avery also made my girl mask-up against my explicit instructions - includin' havin' her pull up the mask OVER her nose "for SAFETY!" even when she didn't have ta. 

An' here's the WURST of IT, our MASKED 'MAND'IT TOLD MY DAUGHTER SHE LOOKED PRETTIER IN A MASK CUZ IT SHOWED OFF HER EYES!
 
So not only was she TOLD she wuz gay, she wuz told she looked BETTER with her FACE COVERED - like the frickin' "unknown comic" in a liberating "freedom hijab!" (I'm too much've a nice gal ta "do" a Popyeye on anyone, but thinkin' 'bout what this sitter said my response is still, "if only I had me spinach!")

Thankfully my daughter did clue me in about the forced maskin' SO I DID tell Avery point-blank that on NO TERMS wuz my girl ta be made ta masked-up in any situation where it wasn't otherwise "enforced."

Avery also made my girl sanitize her hands with toxic Purell -- that is 'til I I got word 'bout that too an' put an' end to it. My kiddo ALWAYS had safe Dr. Bronner's soap in her backpack but until I flapped my jaws the sitter would insist on my daughter usin' the toxic stuff she trusted.

Ah, an' NATCHURLY she tried to talk up the ol' CLOT SHOT even 'fore she herself took it (Miss Sitter more'r'less promoted it 'til her own Auntie of about 60 died suddenly post-jab after which Avery got a mite quiet 'bout that particular "agenda," at least 'round us).  

SO yeah, WOKETARDS that seem hell-bent on "Gay Groomin'" were the same species that took ta forcin' "those less-equipped" to comply with all the fool mandates.

BACK TA THE PARK… social pressures…

In the South Park episode, exhausted after speakin’ up an’ STILL bein' "unheard," Tweek AND Craig both give up on tellin' friends and fambly the truth that they’re just pals. “ONLY pals.  Nobuddy will listen.

They too suck it up, “politely demur,” an' finally arrive at the clever idear of goin' along with the game an' thinkin' they'll outsmart the community by pretendin' ta be gay and then breakin' up.

So… THEY STAGE a FAKE PUBLIC BREAKUP and their ACTING is so convincin’ that it's all believed BUT then it triggers an AVALANCHE dismay-driven maudlin "breakup" pix like this'un here:

It’s as if their breakup “caused” the depression of the entire community who staked their hopes, dreams, an’ misguided fantasies on this strange pre-pubescent affair!

thus, the boys are found guilty! (of disappointin’ the “mob’s” expectations…) instead blamin’ the girl-artists an’ the larger community that invented the entire dang “relationship”

To the dismay of the two boys, when they “pretend to” break-up ALL THE OTHER KIDS LITERALLY STOP TALKING TO THEM plus the PARENTS are GLUM an’ the boys are SHUNNED by the rest of the community.  ALL for not playing their game “as scripted.”

Seein' how that formerly hopeful plan didn't work out AT ALL, they realize if EVER they were ta talk ta ANYONE again an' avoid social exile, they would have to "GET BACK TOGETHER" and continue the dang FARCE they never started, never wanted. 

No spoilers here, but as I said, IT DOES NOT END WELL. 
South Park gets it. ALSO they show you cannot comply your way out of a crisis. (wiser words were never said!)

REAL LIFE PARALLELS…

even cartoons give ya a disclaimer:

“This is a work of fiction. Any similarity to actual persons, living or dead, or actual events, is purely coincidental.”

So, let’s talk ‘bout this “coincidence” then.

The tactic, of COERCED / FORCED ROLE PLAY— is incredibly similar ta compellin’ people inta made up politi-cull support (of BLM, “anti-zionism” etc) AND… of gender identity roles.

Now “Gender reASSignMint,” arguably, is on the same "spectrum" of such artificial roles taken on as a result of SOCIAL PRESSURES—only I’d say gender-switchin’ is more permanent and ultimately is far more DAMAGING—PSYCHO-logically and otherwise!

But it’s all based on OTHERS TELLING YOU WHO YOU ARE or (if ya question) on OTHERS REAFFIRMING YOU ONLY VIA THEIR OWN NARRATIVE / SCRIPT / STORY.

I think of all the poor de-TRANSISTIONerz that get SHUNNED when they revert back to their original genders; they LOSE all the fist bumps, all the support / their “allies,” etc. and are SHUNNED an’ SHAMED just like Tweek AND Craig were.

TRANSitory Identities…

This forced “role play” is SURELY, too, a part of the frankly BIZARRE case of "Jazz Jennings" (born Jaron Seth Bloshinsky) who from the tender age of just FIVE was groomed to be TRANS and told he wuz a girl in a boy’s body so his body had to be made to MATCH his brain. WTF?

While cameras rolled, this little boy ROLED: “I Am Jazz”….

not only “Jazz” got groomed by his fambly, but this spawned a movement that groomed young children too—”litter”-at’cher for Drag Queen Story Hour

How Jazz became…. a living outtake from the Jerry Springer show???

Jazzy?

WHO would do THIS to their child?
(The female hormones in a male also foster weight gain…)

Jazz’s mother, that’s who.

This MOTHER (some "mutha" indeed) "VILECARIOUSLY" revels in the FAN-DUMB, the FAME, an' the copious OUTPOURIN'S of woke-love for her "trans-daughter." It’s indeed very “South-Parkian” (southPORKian?) and borderline abusive far beyond the lines of selfish “grooming” as she once stated: 

" I have woken Jazz out of a dead sleep (…) and I will be so mad if she goes away to college and that thing seals up…"

SHE will be mad? What about poor Jaron / Jazz who likely wanted to sleep and not have “his/her” surgically painful faux orifices “stretched.”

WATCH & LISTEN HERE if you gotta strong stomick!

That “THING?” The fake HOLE surgeons (sturgeons!) made in the body of your child? Golly Moses, that's dee-skustin' an’ beyond DEMEANING. Uch, a parent doing this?!

This is GROOMING for “likes” and attention—it’s near-Munchausen-like, dia-bollock-cull (wull, them bollocks were snipped off afterall…). I’d say this “disorder” wuz likely imagined on the part of the parents, hence this purely unnecessary medical malfeasance that garners sympathy an’ approval ratin’s for the “muther” as well as the child. So the parents too are now trans-“adjacent” and ALLIES of the highest order. (ugh)

BUT the main pernt here is that forcin' a GAY (trans) identity on young folks is DAMAGIN', plumbing “maintenance work” or not!

Deeply damaging in some cases at least, certainly in "All THAT Jazz's."

If older teens wanna find their "way to gay," sans groomin', that's their journey—but I cut little slack fer woksters an' other such gay-by-ASS-O'-CIA-SHUN wannabees includin' adults that have obsessions with their kids' Jazzy "identity disorders" that more likely are simply normal phases or “at most”… statistics back me up, most GROW UP an’ GROW OUT of these gender muddles when left ta their own devices (vs surgiCULLY installed devices!) Here’s an’nuther one whose parents often “join” their trans-child in the spotlight:

Desmond-is-Amazing Napole with MOM…

It's selfish, it's distorted, it REALLY goes BEYOND THE PALE (imho) 

Moldin’ another human, for we are not clay but HUMAN BEANs!—wuther it’s via a woke or gay agenda or via some other vicarious fictional fan-tassy (even “straight” ones such as pedo-vibe beauty pagents) — it’s artificial—and WRONG.

Makes me think’ve (the late, great playwright an’ unabashed Fabian),
George Bernard SHAW:

I like this particular renderin’ as it shows that even Professor Higgins is at the mercy of a higher operator (no angel that!). But moldin’ an’ such grooming IS indeed:

PREYIN' on the GULLIBLE…

Make no mistake, it’s mostly the YOUNG that are fallin’ prey to this groomin’—this “it’s okay ta be gay” or any “YOU ARE a fill-in-the-blank identity” or “meet my gay-trans-furry-bipoc-differently abled friend XYZ“ agenda.

The Minnie & the Maxie

This brings me to my younger daughter gettin’ a dose of the same “woke/groomin’ “ medi-SIN. With “names changed to protect the innocent,” let’s call my older gal Maxie an’ my younger one Minnie. So… Minnie’s neurotypical so a mite less gullible than my Aspie older gal BUT I'll give ya few examples where others tried ta "groom" her too (gol durnit!).

It seems to be a PEER PRESSURE thing too (not unlike whut went down in South Park)

regardless of the agenda… peer pressure happens…

SO… as a preface to sharin’ a few more anecdotes, to understand JUST how pervasive the indoctrination AND group-groomin’ is, one day my younger girl an’ I sat down an' counted in our heads near-bouts 15 kids, just in the homeschool world, that we knew had changed pronouns, changed genders or both!

Most hailed from the Rotten Apple we recently left, but we wuz SURPRISED no-end that some'a that mind-mold-ery wuz goin' on right here’bouts in the boonies!

For example, in one've our new an’ fairly unwoke homeschool co-ops, one teen girl my younger girl met, much ta my child’s pure annoyance, kept introducin' my daughter usin' "THEY THEM" pronouns even tho' more 'n once my daughter said she wuz a SHE! 

the vunderfull vorld of confusing pronouns (?!)

WHY the heck would someone insist on "pro-nounin'in" another teen in their cohort?  Did they feel they might git added validation in their own identity-“discovery” mission? Was it, like with Avery, an attempt ta have some “gay fairy dust“ rub off—even if the dust wuz just an illusion? AND… why refer to an obviously female kid as a non-gender when they're visually presentin’ as an ordinary SHE/HER?! No “butchy” haircult, no “It’s Paaat” keep-’em-guessin’ mien.

It’s Paaaat! (keep ‘em guessin’?)

So, huh? To me bein’ called a THEY when it’s UNinvited is a form of groomin’ even if unintended. AND this is true even if it comes from a kid—in fact “peer groomin’ “ seems ta be quite a pernicious thing!

“Miz-Genderin’ “ aside—I’m addin’ too—WHY on my kiddo’s summer program application which, annoyingly, had a mandatory gender tick box, wuz there no box for “male” or “female.” I had to tick “other” and print FEMALE as an anomalous write-in! AAAAaargh! (as Snoopy would say).

Another kinda-sorta “groomin’ “ example here too…

An' old girlfriend from the city (I say girlfriend in the “old tymey” sense of a pal that’s a gal) who at least used to “identify as female”—but who had, at a certain point, started identy-fryin' as a "GRAYSEXUAL" (say whut?! yup, it’s a “thang”) kept showin' my younger daughter all this crappy gay an' woke literature when they'd meet up fer cawfee at the local bookstore. 

One time? Ok, it’s a “share.” But why PRESS a friend more ‘n once ta LOOK’IT and/or BUY sumthin' they have ABSOLUTELY no interest in? Since WHEN did gettin’ a polite “no-thanks” mean “try again later?”  This wuz, IMO, nearly the same as Avery did ta my elder daughter—pushin’ “gay chick lit” on a completely uninterested straight girl.

Most of these modern “gay” books shouldn’t even count as literature—they’re crap (sorry, I know that’s crude). This ain’t Oscar Wilde or Tennessee Williams (we enjoy these writers muchly) or even Virginia Woolf or the “bi“-Browns” — that’d be Margaret Wise or even Rita Mae (whom my girl hasn’t read but still). SO why would you PUSH crappy gay books on somebuddy if they suck? I find it ODD, don't y'all? I kin only attribute it to AGENDA! Groomin’!  An' it bein’ kinda ballsy too—to “influence” someone, exert “pressure.”

THE YOUNG'UNS are RESTLESS…

Youth are by nature kind of “all over the place”—antsy ta learn, do, see—wantin’ the pleasure of havin’ friends—kinda wantin’ ta fit in, definitely not ta be outcast. Findin’ themselfs… an’ yet kinds losin’ themselfs too—at the same time!

The YOUNG’uns are therefore the most vulnerable
(an’ the most targeted…)

Now in South Park we are talkin' bout LITTLE 4^th Graders, is VELLY young indeed. 

BUT it seems prescient of South Park aimin' this eppy-sode so young! The show wuz just Waaay! ahead of its time KNOWIN' that in SKOOLS TODAY this same kinda GAY KIDDIE SOFT (an' semi-hard…outch!) PORNO stuff is in the CLASSROOMS! So 4^th grade is jus' bout right on target (oy, Target too), THIS is whut they’re assignin’ (ASS’en-inin’) for these kids in skools today (one of many!)—

elementary skool “education”…

How different is this from the YAOI in South Park? Not velly much!

Act-chooly whut's in REAL skools today is, as ya see, even “kinkier”

The YAOI for the South Park kids wuz aimed at the 9 year olds but the YAOI trend, from all I gather, keeps on an' on as they age-up. And yup, it can git fairly lewd. 

In the case of my “impressionable” older daughter it all gits a LOT MORE graphic an’ explicit in terms of what’s marketed to “older” teens and young adults vs for the middle schoolers. It’s very “Brave New World” ta sexualize / genderize-tenderize them at so young an age (as if they were meat, ta be honest).

At any age—wuther it’s via manga or lit or art, or just via social pressure from others to identify with gay/explicit/kinky/trans materials—it’s all essentially Kinsey-esque (as per below); it all sexualizes an’ grooms an’ “unsettles” the comfort of children an’ young people and—for lack of a better word, it sorta “denudes” them, objectifies them, an’ fer lack of a better word—refuses ta let them feel SAFE IN THEIR OWN SKINS (an’ irony of course given all the woke emphasis on perceived “safety” an’ “authentic self discovery” as concepts).

the perp, a pervy deviant quack who started a LOT of this groomin’ malarkey…

Trusted teachers, caregivers, SHOULD NEVER BE associated with…SEX. Yuck. More groomin’, that…

Frankly even if my “Maxie” was not on the spectrum, I'm not at all sure how even a neurotypical older teen would've reacted if THEIR caregiver or TEACHER (yup, that heppens) showed them “queer” readin’ material (graphic or otherwise) or introduced them to others as "gay." An’ my “Minnie,” a younger teen at the time, clearly wuz taken aback even when it came from a longtime “friend.”

Truth is: KIDS includin’ TEENS are not fully EQUIPPED to fight back on WOKESTER GROOMING!

I’d say at best this behavior, includin’ having graphic literature (gay or “straight”) shoved at them by peers or teachers or community leaders, would be downright DISTURBING to most youths, neurotypical or not, making most of them palpably UNCOMFORTABLE in the presence of such age-inappropriate material (unless they’re “programmed” nay-kinsey-fied out of their natural / discomfort which is a scary thought!).

Which brings me ta the link here with “skools” and…

“Sex Ed”-as-cure-ick-u-lum

Peeps, do think back to the 20th C. I recall 7th grade “sex ed” an’ bein’ EXCEEDINGLY uncomfortable with ANYTHIN’ related ta reproduction—which wuz exactly whut we got that class—”sex ed” without any sex at all! Still, ALL of us gals wanted ta hide under our desks. THIS is the kind “graphic” illustration we saw:

“grahpic” skool sex-ed in the 20th C.

This instruction (arguably chaste but did we REALLY need this at ALL at SCHOOL?!) happened in livin’ color animation AND the only live action parts were just talk-scenes starring young adults with REALLY bad haircuts an’ vestiges of their teen acne sittin’ on even uglier couches an’ TALKING about goin’ on a “date.”

An’ yet even THIS made us all wince, shrink down in our seats, giggle nervously, an’ wanna hide from the boys after leavin’ class as if they could “see” — just by lookin’ at us steppin’ out of the dark classroom—pupils with dilated pupils!—as the projector wuz bein’ rewound—what we’d watched…

ALL a FAR CRY from what kids are shown today, righty-oh? So if THIS graphic-un-graphic depiction of “reproduction-not-sex” had us turnin’ 4 shades of red, IMAGINE bein’ in a co-ed class in 2024 an’ seein’ something gob-smackin’ly (ewww sorry) graphic an’ gen-u-ine-ly “nasty.” Eeeeeek! right? (an’ way worse!)

But again, kids are afraid to SPEAK UP— to peers, to authority figures (teachers, counselors, leaders) and ADULTS in general.

it’s intimidatin’!

Just as my girls only balked “gently” when pressured (tho’ at least they didn’t cave), in an academic environ-mint especially, how many kids would just plain WALK OUT on this stuff?

HOW MANY KIDS TODAY WOULD FIND A LINE WAS CROSSED when TEACHERS feel they can give FRANK, SEXUAL, ADVICE (vice!) in the CLASSROOM?!

Aren’t kids an’ teens TOTALLY embarrassed at havin’ teachers discuss “sex techniques” an’ “masterbation” with them (so much for the banned Mark Twain!) while readin’ “Gender Queer” an’ other such “non-literary“ works” like “Flamer” (below, also for elementary school kids)?!

nope, I cain’t see how this book’ll “save lives” but it may screw up a few!

In South Park Tweek and Craig spoke up as best they could but were no match when the entire school including all the administrators were formally presented in the auditorium with “Tweek X Craig” as a couple AND the Yaoi “maga” cartoons that were also displayed on the local art gallery’s walls. Social pressure!

So in reality—and as shown in the animated Tweek X Craig episode, contradictin' an ADULT is awkward—contradictin’ a ROOMFUL of them is near-impossible, an’ contradictin’ a school-full of them?—fergit it! 

So CAN kids in skools fight back against this GAY AGENDA? Not without help.

South Park is purdy clear on this. An’ in my own girls’ experiences, ditto. In a skool settin’ (or scoutin’ group or any other place with adult or older leaders or instructors) it seems that kid-based pushback is not permitted. I’m tryin’ ta imagine it happenin’ in a classroom when some purple-haired, multiply-pierced nose-ringed tattooed “instructor” is challenged on this stuff… Moreover, makin’ it worse, parents are not allowed to KNOW whut the heck's goin' on. THEY ARE KEPT IN THE DARK. On purpose.

It’s just by “chance” (luck?) that some parents—we’ve seen ‘em online / on Libs of TikTok—found out and started yellin’! Frankly it’s only BY CHANCE that I found out too! Heck, my older daughter kept me in the dark for 3 years an’ my younger one only told me her story LONG after the incidents happened…

so… WHAT TO DO?

I’m now a few years past the “Grooming Crimes” —wull, mebbe not quite crimes per se but fairly flagrant Miss da MEANers— so we kin afford ta be a bit reflective vs bein’ reactive (I might’ve been a mite reactive at the time…I’ll admit!)

Honestly I don’t give a hoot whut Avery’s friends think’ve my Maxie (whuther they think she’s gay, straight, or a martian from planet Unicorn which mebbe likely given that particular crowd).

But I DO care ‘bout the bigger picture—the grooming that took place, the tryin’ to force my girls inta lookin’ at gay stuff, inta gay identities, inta follerin’ the wreck-o-MENDATIONS of others!

Woke or not, it’s gone too far and it’s not ok—all that speech about “authentic selves” is not honoring the real (or innocent) nature of actual humas—it’s all FANtasy. The skools an’ colleges ain’t gonna fix themselfs—so it’s up to us—whoever we are, ta tackle this—it’s pervasive, it’s harmful.

Forward, MARCH!

All kids, young adults included, given immature copin' skills not NEARLY as robust as those needed ta counter PUSHY forcefully coercive adults when it comes ta groomin', are gonna need support from those of us that love them. I think we adults—parents, teachers, uncles, aunts, friends of the famblies—need to first let kids (an’ teens, an’ even young adults even) KNOW that they not only can but MUST say NO ta such groomin.’ It’s gotta be FIRM, not quiet. NO more silently acquiescing—even at the risk of their bein’ embarrased—as there’s a LOT more at stake than embarrassment.

An’ this goes fer BOYS an' GIRLS ALIKE!

ALSO—we parents, teachers, uncles, aunts, friends of the famblies—cannot be left in the dark. Once WE know we kin also, in fact we MUST also speak up. GLOVES COME OFF as needed!

FIRST we tell our kiddos ta tell us—moment it happens, ANY of it—the books, the pronouns, showin’ the art anything. BUT ALSO when it seems like it’s gonna be an issue—with “sitters” an’ caregivers that look like they might have a touch’ve wokeness, with teachers, coaches, rainbow scout leaders—we gotta be PROACTIVE—tell ‘em what yer “lines in the sand are.” Mebbe say, as needed, “my daughter’s a girl—if yer teachin’ anything else, I better be told” (else I’ll whoop ya with my hick’ry stick!—jus’ kiddin’…) or “my son’s very uncomfortable with anythin’ sexual in the classroom, so he’s allowed ta step out and opt out even if it’s what’cha call ‘science.’ “ Adapt ta yer own situation… It’s doable and NO insty-2-shun’s gonna do it for us!

On a day-to-day basis this is HAPPENIN’ to our KIDS. If it happened ta BOTH my girls, it kin happen ta yer kiddos too—any age! Young adult even!

Too many kids just “hush up!” HUSH no MORE!

We don’t want a nation of Tweek X Craigs placed ‘tween a rock and a hard place, unable to just be themselves however “unwoke” they are.

So be aware, start figgerin’ out how ta keep yer kids strong when faced with this cwazy stuff. Say it loud, say it TRUE! I will ALWAYS FIGHT FOR YOU!

And… there’s this one too (a Tom Petty cover) both for the kids—their anthem really! it’s gotta be!—an’ for us—we’ll have their backs—promise!

An’ finally—cuz kids are always wantin’ to “fit in”—we gotta let kids know—however it is that “woke” or “gay” or “trans” is bein’ made to look like the COOL thing to do… it’s BALONEY (or bologna if ya wanna spell it thatta way) — don’t fall for the baloney (enjoy the toonz tho’)

And… finally—let’em know that the REAL “In Crowd” don’t need ta “GROOM” in order to “GROOVE!” Just lookit how nifty-keen’ Dobie an’ his backup singers are here—ain’t no hipper than that! Ta me, THAT is the In-Crowd!

So… addressin’ this IMPORTANT issue with yer kids—yer students—the young’uns that’ll listen—is not a once-an'-done conversation either.  It's gotta be reinforced, practiced if needed. 

When I learned ‘bout all of this right here in my own fam, I wuz kinda taken BY SURPRISE—bein’ a purdy attentive mama, us bein’ homeschoolers an’ all—but if it kin happen to US it kin happen ta YOU—yer own fambly. SO… the bottom line’s gotta be—NO GROOMIN’—NOT NOW, NOT EVER—

We have CHILDREN-not-POODLES!
So use yer noodle!

let’s leave the groomin’ ta the poodles!

And on that note…
Here’s ta keepin’ all the ZOOMERS safe from all them GROOMERS!
Daisy

NOW ya kin buy me a cuppa java if ya like, alwayz grateful fer y’all!
https://ko-fi.com/daisymoses

Stay strong in this BULLFIGHT ! against the “bull” (woke ‘er otherwise) an’ give the mighty Marlene a listen!